Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Kane's avatar

Another useful piece of signal-clearing. You've done more than just analyze a supplement; you've provided a perfect blueprint for how to evaluate any new health claim.

You're highlighting the most common flaw in the architecture of wellness arguments: building a towering skyscraper of hype on the weak foundation of a single, observational study.

Your call for "cautious curiosity" is the perfect description of a sound, Bayesian approach to the science. A masterful piece of critical thinking.

Expand full comment
John Reid Young's avatar

A huge amount of research, and evidently “thought for food” goes into your articles. One of my sons has borrowed my copy of “Well Fed”. I wonder if I’ll get it back. Good to see the young ones interested. All the best.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts